103 lines
5.1 KiB
Markdown
103 lines
5.1 KiB
Markdown
# Converting a qtile User to dwm: The Philosophical Argument
|
|
|
|
## **Address Their Python Comfort Zone**
|
|
|
|
### "Python is Actually Holding You Back"
|
|
- **Configuration bloat**: Your qtile config.py probably has 200+ lines doing what dwm does in 20 lines of C
|
|
- **Runtime overhead**: Python interpreter + qtile vs pure C binary - the performance difference is measurable
|
|
- **Dependency hell**: Python versions, library updates, virtual environments - dwm has zero dependencies
|
|
- **False complexity**: You think Python makes things easier, but you're just adding layers of abstraction
|
|
|
|
## **The "True Understanding" Argument**
|
|
|
|
### "You Don't Really Know Your System"
|
|
- **Black box syndrome**: In qtile, you call functions and hope they work. In dwm, you understand every line
|
|
- **Cargo cult configuration**: Copying Python snippets from forums vs actually comprehending window management
|
|
- **Educational value**: Patching dwm teaches you C, X11, and fundamental CS concepts
|
|
- **Debugging reality**: When qtile breaks, you're stuck. When dwm breaks (it doesn't), you can fix it
|
|
|
|
## **Performance That Actually Matters**
|
|
|
|
### "Your System is Slower Than You Think"
|
|
```
|
|
dwm memory usage: ~2MB
|
|
qtile memory usage: ~15-30MB (Python + libraries)
|
|
|
|
dwm startup time: ~10ms
|
|
qtile startup time: ~200-500ms (Python initialization)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
- **Instant responsiveness**: Every qtile action goes through Python interpretation
|
|
- **Battery life**: The Python overhead adds up on laptops
|
|
- **System resources**: Those extra MBs matter on low-end hardware or containers
|
|
|
|
## **The Minimalism Challenge**
|
|
|
|
### "You're Solving Problems You Don't Have"
|
|
- **Feature creep**: qtile's flexibility encourages over-configuration
|
|
- **Maintenance burden**: Your 300-line config.py needs constant tweaking
|
|
- **Distraction factor**: Spending time customizing widgets instead of being productive
|
|
- **The paradox**: More options = more decisions = less focus
|
|
|
|
## **Technical Superiority Arguments**
|
|
|
|
### "C vs Python Isn't Even Close"
|
|
- **Memory safety**: Modern C practices are safer than Python's runtime errors
|
|
- **Predictable behavior**: No garbage collection pauses or interpreter quirks
|
|
- **System integration**: Direct X11 calls vs Python bindings with overhead
|
|
- **Compile-time optimization**: GCC optimizes your exact usage patterns
|
|
|
|
### "Patching is Superior to Configuration"
|
|
- **Version control**: Your dwm patches are actual code changes you can track
|
|
- **No API changes**: Your patches don't break when dwm updates
|
|
- **Community sharing**: Patches are more portable than Python configs
|
|
- **Learning curve**: Forces you to become a better programmer
|
|
|
|
## **The Philosophical Conversion**
|
|
|
|
### "You're Not Actually Customizing, You're Just Configuring"
|
|
- **True customization**: Modifying source code vs calling predefined functions
|
|
- **Ownership**: You literally own every line of your dwm build
|
|
- **Understanding depth**: Know WHY things work, not just HOW to use them
|
|
- **Simplicity appreciation**: Learn to value doing more with less
|
|
|
|
## **Practical Challenges**
|
|
|
|
### "Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is"
|
|
1. **The 500-line challenge**: "Show me a qtile config under 500 lines that does everything you need"
|
|
2. **The startup race**: "Time your login to desktop"
|
|
3. **The dependency audit**: "List everything qtile requires vs dwm's zero dependencies"
|
|
4. **The modification test**: "How long to add a new layout to each?"
|
|
|
|
## **Counter Their Common Objections**
|
|
|
|
### "But Python is easier to read/modify!"
|
|
- **False premise**: Your 300-line config.py isn't easier than 50 lines of clear C
|
|
- **Maintenance reality**: Python configs bit-rot, C code is eternal
|
|
- **Cognitive load**: Following Python abstractions vs understanding direct logic
|
|
|
|
### "But live reloading!"
|
|
- **Compilation speed**: `make && sudo make install` takes 2 seconds
|
|
- **Stability**: Recompiling prevents runtime errors that plague live configs
|
|
- **Intentionality**: The small friction prevents constant tweaking
|
|
|
|
### "But widgets and status bars!"
|
|
- **External tools**: dwm + dwmblocks is more modular than monolithic qtile
|
|
- **Resource usage**: Separate processes vs Python overhead
|
|
- **Tool choice**: Pick the best tool for each job
|
|
|
|
## **The Final Appeal**
|
|
|
|
### "You're Ready for the Next Level"
|
|
> "You chose qtile because you outgrew i3's limitations. But you're still accepting the limitations of interpreted languages and configuration-based customization. dwm is the natural evolution for someone who truly wants to understand and control their environment. The question isn't whether you CAN use dwm - it's whether you're brave enough to stop hiding behind Python's training wheels."
|
|
|
|
## **The Conversion Strategy**
|
|
|
|
1. **Start with respect**: "qtile is clearly superior to most WMs, but..."
|
|
2. **Appeal to their expertise**: "Someone with your Python skills could master dwm in a weekend"
|
|
3. **Challenge their assumptions**: "You think Python makes it easier, but you're solving the wrong problems"
|
|
4. **Offer mentorship**: "I'll help you with your first patches"
|
|
5. **Set a trial period**: "Use dwm for one month, then decide"
|
|
|
|
The key is making them feel like dwm is the graduate-level course they're ready for, not a step backward into primitive tools.
|