### 🎙️ Mini Topic: **Is owning too many USB sticks a cry for help?**

#### Expanded Angles:

- **The tech person's junk drawer:**
  - Everyone’s got that box or drawer filled with tangled cables, adapters, and… a dozen mystery USB sticks.
  - Some are labeled, others are “plug it in and pray.”

- **The utility vs hoarding balance:**
  - You tell yourself it’s good to have backups. One for bootable ISOs. One for config backups. One for the *other* bootable ISO.
  - At what point does your USB collection stop being practical and start being digital nesting?

- **What’s *on* them?**
  - Live Linux distros (from Arch to obscure ones you tried once).
  - Rescue tools, encrypted vaults, personal dotfiles, weird old screenshots.
  - That one USB you *never* plug in because you’re not sure what’s on it and you’re afraid.

- **Identity crisis of USB sticks:**
  - Are they tools? Backups? Time capsules?
  - Is each one a snapshot of where you were in your FOSS journey?

- **Bonus banter:**
  - The universal law: the more USB sticks you have, the fewer you can find when you *actually* need one.

---

### 🎙️ Main Topic: **Does the FOSS label make software more trustworthy?**

#### Expanded Angles:

- **Transparency vs Expertise:**
  - Open source *can* be audited—but most users don’t know how.
  - Trust shifts from “I read the code” to “I trust someone else did.”
  - The illusion of security vs actual peer review.

- **Community dynamics:**
  - Active issues, pull requests, and responsive maintainers signal health.
  - A dead or stale repo feels like abandoned property—trust fades.

- **Corporate FOSS:**
  - What happens when companies open-source tools? (e.g. Microsoft, Meta, Google projects).
  - Does corporate backing help or hurt trust? Is it genuine or strategic?

- **Security and supply chain risks:**
  - Even FOSS projects fall victim to attacks—typosquatting, npm package hijacks, malicious commits.
  - The SolarWinds and XZ Utils examples as reminders that open doesn’t always mean safe.

- **Licensing impacts:**
  - GPL vs MIT vs Apache—how licenses influence user freedom and trust.
  - Are you more likely to trust software with a permissive license or a copyleft one?

- **Ethics and ideology:**
  - FOSS often aligns with personal or political values: privacy, autonomy, anti-surveillance.
  - Does ideological alignment make people overlook technical shortcomings?

- **Examples to spark debate:**
  - Firefox (FOSS) vs Chrome (not fully open).
  - Signal (source-available but central server control) vs Matrix (fully open but fragmented).
  - Bitwarden (open) vs LastPass (closed, had multiple breaches).

- **Final question to toss around:**
  - “Is FOSS inherently more trustworthy—or do we just *want* it to be?”